关于Competition和Cooperation的英文辩论材料

[英文辩论稿]Outline for Beginners Following is a speech outline for (EFL) novice debaters. Too much reliance on this may make your speech inflexible; still, the expressions...+阅读

关于Competition和Cooperation的英文辩论材料

Humans, like all animals, form cooperative groups to compete for limited resources. All life is ultimately competitive, because the natural tendency of any population is to explode, although it is kept in check by the limited food supply (and other factors). Because there are more animals than food, animals must compete to survive. In situations where the food supply is somehow sufficient, deadly competition falls. Liberals therefore advocate the creation of a sustainable economy, where the population is kept constant (through birth control) and resources are used no faster than they can be replaced. The result will be a more cooperative and civil society. Argument In the debate over what type of society is best, conservatives generally favor more competitive societies, whereas liberals favor more cooperative ones. Let's attempt to see which side is correct, The ＂state of nature＂ Many political philosophers -- chief among them John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau -- have attempted to describe what humans were like in their original ＂state of nature.＂ These accounts supposedly describe humans in prehistoric times, before the rise of modern society. Most important was their attempt to explain the rise of human competition and cooperation. These philosophers felt that understanding the ＂state of nature＂ would tell us how to run a more enlightened society. Most of these accounts were scientifically false (which ought to be obvious even to the non-scientist, since these accounts completely disagree with each other). Nonetheless, they continue to be highly regarded by many modern political philosophers. Here is how the ＂Big Three＂ described the ＂state of nature:＂

急需英语辩论的素材

我认为master my fate就是相信自己的决定，然后坚持付出实践。

eg. Following one of Paderewski's performance, a fan said to him, ＂I'd give my life to play like that.＂The brilliant pianist replied,＂I did＂.

潘德瑞.伍斯基的一场演出结束后，一位狂热崇拜者对他说：我要想弹得这么好，需要弹一辈子。这位才华横溢的钢琴家回答道：我正是这么做的。

1.Chiefly the mold of a man's fortune is in his own hands.(Francis Bacon)

一个人的命运模式主要是由自己决定的。（培根）

2.If you doubt yourself, then indeed your stand on shaky ground.(Ibsen, Norwegian dramatist)

如果你怀疑自己，那么你的立足点确实不稳固了。（挪威剧作家，易卜生）

3. If you would go up high, then use your own legs! Do not let yourselves carried aloft;do not seat yourselves on other people's backs and heads.(F.W.Nietzsche, German Philosopher)

如果你想走到高处，就要使用自己的两条腿！不要让别人吧你抬到高处；不要坐在别人的背上和头上。

4. Miracles sometimes ovvur, but one has to work terribly for them.(C.Weizmann, Irish President)

奇迹有时候是会发生的，但是你得为之拼命地努力。（爱尔兰总统，魏茨曼.C）

5. You never know what you can do till you try. (Frederick Marryat, British novelist)

除非你亲自尝试一下，否则你永远不知道你能够做什么。（英国小说家马里亚特）

同学，专八的作文要求400字，一个例子和一个名句，就足够了。

如果篇幅比较小的，多举例其实会掩盖你自己的观点和议论，是会使文章的陷入“没原则”的境地。我积累了挺多的好词好句，以备需要。挑了一些可以用用的。希望可以帮到你

急求一段英语辩论素材

Taking up a part-time job while studying can have its pros and cons like anything else. In my opinion, working while studying should be discouraged because one will be constantly tired due to the need to balance the commitments from both sides.We must be clear about our priorities in life. It will not serve a student well if his/her grades begin to deteriorate because of his/her part-time job. Not everyone is able to balance their work and study commitments really well. In addition, college life does not entail academics only. There are many student clubs and extra-curricular activities on campus.An undergraduate can fully enjoy college life only if he/she participates in these activities. Through these activities, not only can students acquire different skills, they can also enjoy their youth. Taking up a part-time job will draw them away from these opportunities....

急求英语辩论赛材料

第一点就是目标和现实的差距，即通识教育本身是否大学里能够做好。通识是好的，但是这个东西本身好，不见得通过不分专业的大平台教育就能真正实现通识的好处。也可能导致学生学的多而浅，浪费了时间，不能更快的深入到专业知识，将来就业的时候也是没有强项，因为大学一共就就是那么几年，如果直接分专业，可以学的很深入透彻，但是如果浪费时间在大的平台上，后面也学不了多深。第二点就是从知识本身来说。其实人们不管学什么，都是先从一点开始，一个方向开始，当这个方向学习的越多，就相当于一个点变成了一个圆，它与外界的边界接触也越大，这就意味着想要突破和深入，你必须要去拓展。这里的道理就在于事物是相互联系的，而只有你深入了你才知道从哪里入手去考察他们的联系，从哪里开始拓展自己的知识，你是有方向的。

也就是从专到博，比如你学英文的，但是词汇语法懂了以后就可能研究到英语文学，就会涉及到文学，文学是写生活的，就会涉及到社会学。如果你做语言学的研究，会涉及到逻辑学、哲学、人类学。如果你做科学翻译，又不得不去了解理科、工科。也就是从专到博，这是一个自然而然的过程，效率高，也利于学生自己按照自己的特点发展。但这个专是前提，即知道自己要什么。人有这样的自觉扩展的能力，大学也需要培养人们的这种能力。不分专业的问题在于其实那些优势真正通过几门概论课是实现不了的，大家还是什么都不懂，反而会迷茫，反而不知道将来选什么专业，反而失去目标，结果就可能是既不专也不博，这样发展很不好。...