[《我为谁工作?》读后感]没翻阅此本书之前,我问了很多人这样一个问题:你到底在为谁工作?大多数人的回答是:我在为自己而工作。也许有人说的涵义是为自己打工挣钱,也许有人说的是为自己的理想而奋斗,也许是...+阅读
Ice Age 冰河世纪 英语影评It's not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001's rollicking success, I wouldn't have even believed it could happen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn't even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar's Toy Story heights, apparently content to revel in its status as Monster's, Inc.'s second rate, half wit cousin.Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cavemen. This time, it's the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home. Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It's like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for. Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we're going for here, then I suppose I'm all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I'm not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It's laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story's attempts at heartfelt, soft touches. Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano's vocal talents aren't particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation. The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film's only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age's comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you're under 5, you'll be bored with everything else.
延伸阅读:
你为谁工作读后感我们到底是在为谁工作呢?如果不尽快弄清这个问题,不调整好自己的心态,一辈子我很可能与成功无缘。在当今这个浮躁的年代,我们需要用什么去重新点燃工作激情,实现自我价值?你在为...
我为谁工作读后感我在为谁工作?这可真是一个内涵很丰富的问题。因为这是一个人的世界观人生观的问题,反映着一个人的内心素质与外在表现。这也正是我读完《我在为谁工作》后的感慨!当然,我也曾...
一个好公司必有的铁规定读后感一个好公司必有的铁规定读后感 (一) 不以规矩不能成方圆,一家好公司,不仅有严格的各项规则制度,员工对企业文化的认同和执行,也是非常重要的一方面。广电系统一直面临企业化改革的...
《长征—前所未有的故事》读后感《长征前所未有的故事》读后感 《长征前所未有的故事》这本书是美国作家哈里森.索尔兹伯里沿着红军的长征路线,亲自走了这段路程。读完这本书之后,让我对长征也了解得很多了。...
谁背上了猴子读后感文章里例举了四个例子。情境一:第一种是当经理与他的第一个下属相遇时,下属说:“我们遇到了一个问题。”经理觉得这个问题需要他参与,而他当时对情况还不够了解,不能当场拍板,就表...
心理书籍读后感1500字有的速度给我心理学书籍读后感》由网友提供或由范文网于网络收集与整理,其版权属于原作者。生命对你意味着什么(what life should mean to you by Alfred Adler)这本书是奥地利精神病学家Al...
谁住在皮球里读后感是啊,谁在皮球里呢?谁住在圆不溜球的快乐的屋子里呢?是仙女吗?太可能了。可是细一想,仙女应该生活在森林里呀,怎么会住在圆球里呢?那么,可能是地下精灵?这倒是很可信的。因为地下精灵...
谁有的观后感?孩子踏入青春叛逆期,父母们通常会投诉孩子很坏不听话,很难与孩子沟通,其实孩子真的坏吗?真的完全无法和孩子沟通吗?每个孩子都会经历叛逆期,如果这个时候,家长和老师们没给予适当的...
谁有的读后感?50字就够了!不要太多!彻彻底底的悲剧。一个曾经勤劳坚忍,有着自己目标的人最后却沦为了社会垃圾。从前的祥子善良淳朴,正直诚实,对生活有着像骆驼一般积极和坚韧。周围的人都是做一日和尚,敲一日钟,而...