民事诉讼答辩状中英文对照

[房屋买卖答辩状]房屋买卖答辩状1 双方在订立该《住房买卖协议》时违背了《合同法》的基本原则，和《婚姻法》关于夫妻共同财产平等处分权的规定，依法应认定为无效。双方可以协商解除，或另行商...+阅读

答辩状是被告(人)、被反诉人、被上诉人、被申请(诉)人针对起诉状、反诉状、上诉状、再审申请(诉)书的内容，在法定期限内根据事实和法律进行回答和辩驳的文书，是诉状中使用频率最高的文种之一。下面是小编为大家带来的民事诉讼答辩状中英文对照，欢迎阅读参考！

ANSWER TO PLAINT

答辩人：人民医院

住址：市路七号

Respondent： Peoples Hospital

Address： No 7, Road, City

因要求人民医院人身损害赔偿一案，现提出答辩意见如下：

The following answer is hereby given to the claim of for pensation by the Peoples Hospital for personal injuries：

1.答辩人与之间不存在直接的合同关系，答辩人1998年6月10日与第二建筑安装工程公司订立了一份口头合同，由第二建筑安装工程公司负责把答辩人的一个高压电表柜拆除，是受第二建筑安装工程公司的委托来拆除高压电表柜的，与答辩人之间不存在直接合同关系。

1. The respondent does not he a direct contractual relationship with . The respondent entered into an oral contract with No 2 Construction and Installation pany on June 10, 1998, whereby No 2 Construction and Installation pany shall be responsible for removing the high-voltage meter cabi. was engaged in removing the high-voltage meter cabi as entrusted by No 2 Construction and Installation pany and therefore has no direct contractual relationship with the respondent.

2.的伤害赔偿应由二建筑安装工程公司负责，其一，根据我国法律和有关司法解释规定，第二建筑安装工程公司对其职工在履行合同的范围内所受到伤害应负责任，的伤害并不是由于合同客体以外的事物造成的。其三，受第二建筑安装工程公司委托的在拆除高压电表柜的过程中，存在着严重违反操作程序的行为，未尽一个电工应尽的注意。

2. The liabilities for pensating for the damage shall be born by No 2 Construction and Installation pany for the following reasons. Firstly, pursuant to PRC laws and relevant judicial interpretations, No 2 Construction and Installation pany shall be liable for any injuries suffered by its employees to the extent of the contract performance. The injuries of was not caused by anything other than the object of the contract. Thirdly, , who was entrusted by No 2 Construction and Installation pany, seriously violated the operational procedure in removing the high-voltage meter cabi and failed to pay due attention thereto.

3.答辩人对伤害赔偿不应承担责任。根据我国《民法通则》的规定，从事高度危险作业的人致他人损害的，应负赔偿责任。而本案中答辩人与第二建筑安装工程公司订有合同，高度危险来源已通过合同合法地转移给第二建筑安装工程公司。第二建筑安装工程公司成为该危险作业物的主体，在操作过程中受到伤害，这是第二建筑安装工程公司在履行合同过程中，合同客体造成自己员工的伤害行为，与答辩人无关。

3. The respondent shall not be liable for pensating the injuries of . In accordance with the General Principles of the Civil Law, any person engaged in highly dangerous operation shall be liable for pensation in the event of any damages. In this case, however, the respondent entered into a contract with No 2 Construction and Installation pany, whereby the source of high danger shifted to No 2 Construction and Installation pany legitimately. No 2 Construction and Installation pany became the subject of the dangerous operation, and therefore any damages caused in the contract performance by No 2 Construction and Installation pany has no connection with the respondent.

综上所述，人民医院为不适合被告，请贵院依法驳回原告起诉。

By reason of the foregoing, Peoples Court is not legible for being the defendant. We hereby request the court to reject the plaintiffs action according to law.

此致

市中级人民法院

To：

City Intermediate Peoples Court

答辩人：人民医院

Respondent： Peoples Court

日期：

Date：

民事诉讼答辩状中英文对照