观看《国王的演讲》有感

[观看于海河有感]第一篇他为人公道正派、襟怀坦荡，工作勤勉敬业、求真务实，生活低调简朴、平时淡然，他就是原县政协副主席于海河同志。他因病永远的离开了，但是他用生命践行了党的群众路线，展示...+阅读

第一篇

演讲，对于一个政治家来说，是最基本的素质。历史正是靠这些善于鼓动人心的说客们的三寸不烂之舌，把易受蛊惑的民众忽悠地各个群情激奋、斗志昂扬。开篇一场，电台直播之前的准备工作充满了仪式感，让我们看到了皇家的派头和考究，雄浑中夹杂着不安的配乐还有王以及各色人等的表情也让人体会到那股山雨欲来风满楼的压抑。可惜的是，面对肃然起立、洗耳恭听的民众，王退却了，那股欲言无声的抓狂、欲哭无泪的羞愧，让王的前路充满了阴霾，他辜负了父王的信任，玷污了皇室的光辉，也让贤良的王后有些失落。贯穿电影通篇的矛盾被强有力的摆了出来。接下来的就是一场王与自己心理缺陷的战争。上帝宠幸世人，却让世人通过苦难来获取新生，上帝让伯蒂成为王，却让他无法流畅的宣扬自己的观点，真是莫大的讽刺。

这个口齿不清，脾气暴躁的国王，有一个强权的父亲，一个玩世不恭的哥哥，从小就处于弱势的状态，童年的阴影，让他产生生理的缺陷，继而发大投射到心理的恐惧，像一团乌云，压在心头。纵有他有当国王的野心却看不到当王的前途，心中更是郁愤难抒，倘若不是遇到了罗格，恐怕一切都将陷入更加混乱的黑暗。罗格这个可爱的离退休教授，用自己独特的原则、淡定从容的气度和诚挚的付出，融化了高高在上的王，让王对他吐露心声，引作知己，连主教都不放在眼里。

说话，最简单的事情，落到王的身上，就成为了一个庞大国家的声音。这个片子有一个关于超越自我的宏大主题，却用说话这个最简单的切入点来抽丝剥茧、逐步推进，着实妙哉。当生命背负上沉重的枷锁，王便也成了戴着脚镣跳舞的英雄。影片的这一设定，把王的光环去掉，还原成一个比普通人伯蒂。王与罗格初次见面的时候，两个人就对彼此的称呼来了一番较量，这其中既体现了社会等级在人与人之间造成的尴尬的沟通障碍又褒奖了罗格无视可笑的世俗制度的自信和决心。纵使他可以拥有一个帝国，摘下王的面具还是普通的人，他也有妻儿，也有自己不可为外人道的小故事。伯蒂与罗格对饮的时候，说道，我在大街上遇到一个陌生人，我对他们一无所知，他们却对我了如指掌，这是伯蒂对身为皇室成员毫无隐私失去自由的境地的控诉。而罗格却用那颗仁爱的心，挽救了这个骄傲中透着可怜的王，更让他真正承担起了自己该肩负的责任。

钟情于古典英国题材的导演，力图在行云流水间展示出皇室成员的生活，为普通人揭开一角神秘的面纱，满足一下窥视的好奇欲望，他做到了。影片的节奏有序而沉稳，宛若一个英国举止优雅的风度翩翩的绅士。纵偶有沉闷之感，也凭借精致的构图和冷静的色彩以及时而细腻时而宏大的乐曲，让人不由得陷入其中，整个故事显得极其饱满、庄重。在最后一幕，伯蒂与罗格在直播间里面的无声交流与电波另一头的各个阶层的民众们的镜头不断切换，逐渐把整个故事带向高潮，当最后一个单词吐出，一切都结束了，伯蒂战胜了自己，人民获得了新的王，英国也拥有了踏上战场的豪情。

这是一部以表演与剧情相得益彰的电影，片中的几位主演都发挥了自己老戏骨的本领，把各自的角色刻画的入木三分。科林饰演的王的隐忍和愤怒，无奈与痛苦，无意义的挣扎和力不从心的沮丧，都在他嗫嚅的嘴唇下让人动容，最后一幕，那长时间的沉默，让人为之揪心。从《加勒比海盗》里走出来的杰弗里没有了乖张的戾气，转而变得温文尔雅还有一点小幽默，那股诲人不倦的坚持和优雅让人如沐春风。才华横溢的海伦娜也不再像《哈利波特》里那般邪气逼人，用她强大的演技塑造了一个既不会太过耀眼夺去科林的光芒又如同静静发光的美玉让人无法忽视带给人高贵之感的伊丽莎白王后，当真不愧为英伦玫瑰。皮尔斯演绎的爱江山更爱美人的爱德华八世，让人充满新鲜感和他为爱而背叛皇族的挣扎和彷徨在老国王死去的刹那全部释放了出来。这一群可爱的性格演员相互飚戏，电光火石之间为我奉献了一部精彩绝伦的励志电影。

我们无法成为王，所以不必艳羡皇室的光鲜，但是在面对各自的缺陷的时候，却可以像伯蒂一样去战胜它，做生活中的王者。人无完人，哪怕是身份地位很高的国王，每个人都会存在自己的缺点，只要我们勇于正视勇敢地去克服它，敢于去面对自己的不足，并加以改正，这是最好的选择!

第二篇

Rarely do you get to see a movie that promises a lot and then, lives up to its promise. The Kings Speech is a rare piece,indeed.

The movie starts off with a stammering speech and signs off with a staggering one, with hardly any glitches in between. The basic premise of the movie is fairly simple. A king with a stutter is helped by a merick speech therapist to overe his problem and bee an inspiring orator. That sounds like a very known territory to most movie goers. But few minutes into the movie, and you realize that this one simply pushes the bar a notch higher.

It is a very pleasing movie, doesnt lead the audience into a lot of unfortable questions. However, the artistry lies in the overall balance of the movie. You slowly start getting gripped by Did Seidlers screenplay. The actors are superb, takes it slow and steady with superb grip on each of their characters. While Colin Firth puts in a spectacular performance (one you cant miss)， Geoffrey Rush goes a bit more old school and pulls off a subtle and deep portrayal. One that fills up your heart but also keeps your brain active. Humor es in here and there, with a very easy flow and steady pace. Not for a single moment do you perceive the movie as dull. Helena Bonham Carter is good. Guy Pearce is appropriate, though he does look a bit too casual at times (maybe that was an intentional character flaw)。

Most of the movie had been filmed indoors, albeit with eloquent art direction. But the occasional sequences shot outside had been filmed very beautifully, portraying a very dreamy picture of the then England. Sometimes, the camera goes in too close to the characters, and stays there for a while, just long enough to give us a sense of suffocation, quite an artistic equivalent of a speech disorder ! But then again, negative shades had been whitewashed with joyous ones and you never perceive it as a dark movie. Direction wise, Tom Hooper is bang on ! This is the kind of a movie where you want to give a lot of credit to the director. The set-up is such that the dramatic elements are high but needs to be tamed, so that it doesnt goes over board. And Mr.Hooper hits the bulls eye ! Perfect balance.